Weber on Authority
Rational
legal authority is formal in Weberian terms. Traditional authority is
substantive or an emotional commitment to duty. If Weber is right then
charismatic authority is a direct challenge to the legitimacy of the
established order. The routinization of charismatic authority or “Routinization of Charisma” will reestablish a
legitimate authority. Marx has Kautsky the original message is
simplified and domesticated.
The
charismatic leader is a revolutionary in opposition and emancipation from
routine. Charismatic authority establishes a new pattern of conformity that
becomes a duty. In the beginning the authority is a moral authority before it
becomes routine. Obedience is morally correct, duty the followers are to
follow. Then routinization of the followers becomes final when the leader dies
the leaders teachers becomes another tradition. Trotsky permanent revolution is
a way of realizing this problem?
Authority
existing within a corporate groups, even democratic ones, there will be certain
set themselves apart from the main group because of their knowledge to become
coordinators of other peoples behavior. In those situations leadership will
become more stable and expertise is secondary.
In
egalitarian groups with nearly equal distribution of weapons leadership is
founded on persuasion and personal appeal and therefore situational and
unstable.
In
non-democratic situations whether appointed, assumed or elected those in
authority have something other than ideological support for their position of
influence. Coercion, persuasion, or ideological certainties are part of a continuum of tools to keep the people
in line.
Some
people have more influence and thus they form a separate body within the group.
This is true even if the authority is temporary and situational like at band
level society.
No comments:
Post a Comment