Weber:
Rational legal authority has generalized rules that are logically consistent,
defining the limits of authority and its jurisdiction. Rules are universal,
impartial and impersonal. Individuals are covered by these rules. Again this is
an ideal type not totally existing in reality. Yet, because it is ideal and
legal authority is judged by these standards, and where it fails to live to
this ideal is seen as a problem. This problem helps define further political
action.
Rational
legal authority: Authority is limited to the legal explanation of a specific
office. A specific sphere of
competence, which is covered by closely well-defined job description and is
this strictly understandable written rules described sets of responsibilities
is explanation of the office, which identifies the criteria for performance
evaluation, sets apart that office from other offices. Influence of the
individual is limited to her sphere of competence as defined by legal
description of the office itself. Outside of that office the office holder is a
private citizen. Again this is another ideal type, but one that is used to formally
to assess the performance of the office holder.
No comments:
Post a Comment