Appropriation with fair reimbursement or expropriation without compensation
Reform always costs
those who are to benefit from the reform. Thus those who are required to give
up their benefits need be compensated for the loss of their privilege. Those
who are fighting the good fight for the benefit for the destitute, labors and
the wounded of the current economy must carry on the struggle beyond the
victory or loose everything. Reform can happen in no other way, as the powerful
will compromise only when forced too. Then the will give up only what they have
to. With each victory begins the next battle.
The issue remains both
resources at hand for transforming society, and the relative strengths of the
contesting parties. First even revolutionary success has to face the lack of
existing resources and institutions for the socialization of the economy.
Public ownership is not enough, because unless it is managed by direct
democratic participation then it is not really public ownership and thus it is
not socialism. With the absence of current reserves and organizations for this
conversion from private to public, bureaucratic to democratic, from government
to popular control no socialization of the economy is taking place. Reform or
revolution the results are the same. Step by step each win must be followed by
yet another contest over assets. When the relative strength of employee
improves and education and skill allows the administrative functions to be not
understandable but measurable, accessible and to direct producers will
accountability be in the handoff the general population.
Yet power is defined as
and by the comparative disputes and associations between not only the two major
classes, but also the contacts between all the classes and class factions in
society. Each class and each fragment within each class has its’ own welfares
to protect in the supervision of the economy. Both negotiation and cooperation
are important strategies for the laboring multitudes in the ultimate contest
between the exploited and the exploiters. Some will call this egalitarian
others will say it is administrative control. A number of people will claim
this democratic others will speak of it as bureaucratic. The reality it is
both. As democracy increases bureaucracy declines. But, democracy is a process
and a lifestyle and not a product. The economy compels us to realize endless
examination and modification of economic choices to meet the real needs and
issues that arises from unanticipated consequences of previous decisions.
The revolution can only
attain, what the preexisting resources will allow. Economic and political
strategies must be guided with real and objective information. This genuine and
factual data must be gathered and studies using a combination of historical and
scientific methods. The historical sociologist then shares her findings with
the public.
At every point reform or
revolution, forces of reaction are mobilized. Irrational emotional appeals
mobilize those looking overly simple answers to complex problems to reactionary
naïve catchphrases.
Source: Karl Kautsky: The Labor Revolution
Source: Nikolai Bukharin: The New Economic Policy Of Soviet Russia
No comments:
Post a Comment