An Historical Explanation of Interdisciplinary,
Cross-disciplinary, and Trans-disciplinary: Why Dr. Michael Joseph Francisconi,
MS, Ph.D is a good fit for Interdisciplinary Studies.
The masters (or “Fathers,” if you will) of both
Sociology and Cultural Anthropology were in fact interdisciplinary to begin
with. The rigid boundaries between the various disciplines in historical
studies came much later at the Universities because of budget conflicts between
departments. As I will try to show, in order to further the development of the
various focus areas, the Professors needed to communicate with, borrow from,
and understand what other scholars were saying. Political Sociology/
Anthropology by definition is interdisciplinary. Anthropologists cannot ignore
Ecology. The relationship between Economics and Sociology was at the very
beginning assumed. Economic Anthropology has always asked the question, how
much can Anthropology learn from Economics? The in-house debates were what
economic model best offers a usable pattern with which to work.
German philosophers Immanuel Kant through
Heinrich Rickert influenced Weber (the father of Sociology) particularly in the
concept of value-free sociology, i.e. the purely formal-logical analysis which
states as its goal the establishing of the conditions under which scientific
analysis of society is even possible as opposed to the traditional study of
defining before hand the priorities, the methodology and distinctions between
information being used as data. Weber argued that knowledge is historically
determined, and thus it is important to develop a formal empirical approach to
the study of history that can be verified independent of historical
circumstances. Weber said that only by establishing an objective body of
historical data to work with can we begin our interpretive process in the study
of history. Sympathetic understanding then combines the objective with the
subjective. Weber offered a way to understand culture through the native point
of view, but only with a body of data that can be reanalyzed at a later date in
a different historical setting. While Weber is a father of Sociology all his
academic appointments were in Economics. In fact Weber’s interest in Sociology
grew out of his debate with the rising neo-classical school of Economics that
studied Economics as a pure science. Weber on the other hand studied economics
embedded in a historical and social setting. This was the German historical
school. The neo-classical was the Austrian school.
Marx, as is well known, was a Philosopher,
Sociologist, Anthropologist, Historian, Economist and Political Scientist. Marx
studied under the German Philosopher Feuerbach, who studied under Hegel. Marx
got his start by associating with the Young (left) Hegelians. Marx’s methodology
was Hegelian. Marx was equally influenced by the teachings of the ancient
philosopher Epicurus and the Atomists like Democritus. Marx’s ethics were
founded on Epicurean ethics. French political theorists also influenced Marx,
including Saint-Simon, Proudhon and Fourier. The British Economists Smith,
Ricardo, Owen and many others were also important, as were the English
Chartists. Both Engels and Marx were very impressed by Darwin.
Polanyi was a Hungarian scholar who studied
Economic History in Vienna as part of the Austrian School which Polanyi would
seriously assess as exposing the Historical and Anthropological flaws in both
Classical and Neoclassical Economic studies. Polanyi’s critique of capitalism
which emphasizes that historically the “noneconomic’” determines the economy
of traditional society shows that economics is
embedded in social responsibility that is defined by specific societies set in
particular historical settings. Only through careful historical and
cross-cultural studies of economics can we separate out the culturally and
historically specific from the near universal, if possible, economic traits.
Polanyi though a trained in Historical Economics is the father of Economic
Anthropology.
Julian Steward coined the term Cultural Ecology
that is a continuation of his theory of Multi-linear Evolution. Multi-linear
Evolution searches for regularities in cultural change. Cultural laws can be
defined that explain these changes. Determinism is not the issue, but patterns
of historical change follow patterns of an interaction between parts of a
society and the larger environment. Cultural traditions have distinctive
elements that can be studied in context. Similarities and differences between
cultures are meaningful and change in meaningful ways. The evolution of
recurrent forms, processes, and functions in different societies has similar
explanations. Each society has its own specific historical movement through
time. This prefaces cross-cultural studies.
Diachronic Anthropology starts with change as the
only constant. Thus, cultural studies begin and end with the evolution and
history of cultures and cross-cultural studies examines closely the effects of
cultural change of surrounding cultures on the changes of a particular culture.
Historical Sociology focuses on changing social
structures and how the complex of social institutions interact in that process
of change, and how long-term national and international trends affect that
change.
The major thesis of Political Sociology is that
politics cannot be isolated from other subsystems of a society. Political
Anthropology has defined its interest in how power is put to use in a social
and cultural environment. Power is defined as political influence to accomplish
certain aims. Through cultural interpretation, the political culture defines
certain goals as acceptable. Political systems operate within an historical
setting. The ability to make and enforce decisions is the basis of power, and
power is what Political Anthropologists study. Political Anthropology
investigates the everyday experiences of people as they are shaped by their
economic position in a particular society, and the world economy that molds
most political issues.
Thus, given the historical evidence above, I am a
Sociologist and Anthropologist as well as Historian, Economist, and Political
Scientist.
No comments:
Post a Comment